Search Field Guide
Advanced Search
MT Gov Logo
Montana Field Guide

Montana Field Guides

Swamp Milkweed - Asclepias incarnata

Species of Concern
Native Species

Global Rank: G5
State Rank: S1S2
(see State Rank Reason below)
State Threat Score: No Known Threats
CCVI: Moderately Vulnerable
C-value: 6


Agency Status
USFWS:
USFS:
BLM:


 





State Rank Reason (see State Rank above)
Asclepias incarnata is rare in Montana where it occurs only in the south-central portion of the state. Populations in Carbon County are considered native. Populations growing in vicinity of residential and agricultural areas are likely originating through seed dispersal from ornamental or garden plantings. At least one sub-population in Carbon County was lost prior to 2005 from renovations designed to prevent Whirling Disease at the Bluewater Fish Hatchery, managed by Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (MFWP). Native populations continue to face potential threats from possible future renovations at the fish hatchery as MFWP creates barriers to prevent introductions of non-native animals, such as the New Zealand Mud Snail. Both native and accidental introductions of Asclepias incarnata face threats from non-native perennial grasses and noxious weeds, and incompatible land management actions where plants grow in natural areas encroached upon by development. In addition, shifts in climate may negatively impact Asclepias incarnata over the next decade or longer, particularly from the effects of increased temperatures, increased frequency and severity of droughts, and/or decreased snowpack. However, impacts from a shifting climate remain unknown. Surveys that bring forth current information on population counts, habitat quality, and assess for threats at native populations are greatly needed. Surveys are also needed in areas modeled as Predicted Suitable Habitat. Developing collaborative conservation agreements with state land managers and private landowners are needed to ensure the persistance of Asclepias incarnata, particularly native populations. Implementing monitoring of populations at and near the Bluewater Fish Hatchery is necessary to also assess short- and long-term population trends.
Swamp Milkweed (Asclepias incarnata) Conservation Status Summary
State Rank: S1S2
Review Date = 05/06/2026
See the complete Conservation Status Rank Report
How we calculate Conservation Status Ranks
 
General Description
Fibrous-rooted. Stems simple to branched, 70–100 cm. Herbage glabrous to puberulent on the stem. Leaves opposite, spreading; blades lanceolate, 4–15 cm long. Umbels of 10 to 40 flowers; peduncles 1–7 cm long. Flowers 9–11 mm high; sepals villous, 1–2 mm long; petals purplish, glabrous, 5–6 mm long; gynostegium pink, glabrous, 1–2 mm high; hoods oblong, 2–3 mm long; horns exserted, arching. Follicles erect, fusiform, 5–8 cm long, smooth, mostly glabrous (Lesica et al. 2012. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants. BRIT Press. Fort Worth, TX).

Our plants are variety incarnata.

Phenology
Flowering in July.

Diagnostic Characteristics
The combination of acute leaves >4 mm wide and slender horns longer than the hoods distinguish Asclepias incarnata from other Montana milkweeds. Asclepias speciosa also has pinkish corollas and occupies wetland habitat, but has large hoods that surpass the horns.

Species Range
Montana Range Range Descriptions

Native
 


Range Comments
SK to NS south to NM and FL. Known from Carbon County (Lesica et al. 2012. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants. BRIT Press. Fort Worth, TX). In Montana, native populations appear to be limited to the Clarks Fork of the Yellowstone drainage. The species is planted in other areas and may spread further from these plantings. As such, additional observations are expected outside of its suspected native range.

Observations in Montana Natural Heritage Program Database
Number of Observations: 16

(Click on the following maps and charts to see full sized version) Map Help and Descriptions
Relative Density

Recency

 

(Observations spanning multiple months or years are excluded from time charts)



Habitat
Wet meadows and thickets.
Predicted Suitable Habitat Model

This species has a Predicted Suitable Habitat Model available.

To learn how these Models were created see here

National Vegetation Classification System Groups Associated with this Species
Wetland and Riparian
Alkaline - Saline Wetlands
Riparian and Wetland Forest
Riparian Shrubland
Wet Meadow and Marsh

Ecology
POLLINATORS
The following animal species have been reported as pollinators of this plant species or its genus where their geographic ranges overlap: Bombus vagans, Bombus huntii, Bombus rufocinctus, Bombus ternarius, Bombus terricola, Bombus pensylvanicus, Bombus bimaculatus, Bombus griseocollis, Bombus impatiens, Bombus insularis, and Bombus flavidus (Plath 1934, Heinrich 1976, Thorp et al. 1983, Colla and Dumesh 2010, Colla et al. 2011, Koch et al. 2012, Williams et al. 2014, Tripoldi and Szalanski 2015).


Threats or Limiting Factors
STATE THREAT SCORE REASON
Threat impact not assigned because threats are not known (MTNHP Threat Assessment 2021).

References
  • Literature Cited AboveLegend:   View Online Publication
    • Colla, S., L. Richardson, and P. Williams. 2011. Bumble bees of the eastern United States. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service, Pollinator Partnership. 103 p.
    • Colla, S.R. and S. Dumesh. 2010. The bumble bees of southern Ontario: notes on natural history and distribution. Journal of the Entomological Society of Ontario 141:39-68.
    • Koch, J., J. Strange, and P. Williams. 2012. Bumble bees of the western United States. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service, Pollinator Partnership. 143 p.
    • Lesica, P., M.T. Lavin, and P.F. Stickney. 2012. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants. Fort Worth, TX: BRIT Press. viii + 771 p.
    • MTNHP Threat Assessment. 2021. State Threat Score Assignment and Assessment of Reported Threats from 2006 to 2021 for State-listed Vascular Plants. Botany Program, Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, Montana.
    • Plath, O.E. 1934. Bumblebees and their ways. New York, NY: Macmillan Company. 201 p.
    • Thorp, R.W., D.S. Horning, and L.L. Dunning. 1983. Bumble bees and cuckoo bumble bees of California (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Bulletin of the California Insect Survey 23:1-79.
    • Tripoldi, A.D. and A.L. Szalanski. 2015. The bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus) of Arkansas, fifty years later. Journal of Melittology 50: doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/jom.v0i50.4834
    • Williams, P., R. Thorp, L. Richardson, and S. Colla. 2014. Bumble Bees of North America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 208 p.
  • Additional ReferencesLegend:   View Online Publication
    Do you know of a citation we're missing?
    • Heidel, B. 1994. Potential impact of proposed noxious weed treatment at Bluewater Fish Hatchery (MDFWP) on plant species of special concern. Unpublished report to Gary Shaver, Bluewater Fish Hatchery. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, Montana. 5 pp.
    • Lesica, P., M.T. Lavin, and P.F. Stickney. 2022. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants, Second Edition. Fort Worth, TX: BRIT Press. viii + 779 p.
  • Web Search Engines for Articles on "Swamp Milkweed"
Login Logout
Citation for data on this website:
Swamp Milkweed — Asclepias incarnata.  Montana Field Guide.  .  Retrieved on , from