Search
Advanced Search
MT Gov Logo
MONTANA FIELD GUIDE™

MONTANA FIELD GUIDE™

 

Mountain Lousewort - Pedicularis pulchella

Species of Concern
Native Species

Global Rank: G3
State Rank: S3
(see State Rank Reason below)
State Threat Score: Unknown
CCVI: Extremely Vulnerable
C-value:


Agency Status
USFWS:
USFS:
BLM:


 





State Rank Reason (see State Rank above)
DRAFT: Requesting feedback on the 2026 revised rank, factors, and State Rank Reason outlined below and in the Conservation Status Rank Report. Pedicularis pulchella is rare in Montana, where it is known from alpine habitats in six different mountain ranges . Occurrences are in remote areas with most of the known populations occurring within designated wilderness areas. The remote habitat limits the potential for negative impacts, and no significant and widespread threats to the species are known besides potential impacts associated with climate change. Population levels are poorly documented, and trends are unknown though populations have likely been relatively stable in the recent past or experienced only minor declines. Only four of the occurrences have been visited since 2009. The remaining occurrences have not been visited since 1993 with the majority of those not being visited in more than 50 years, leading to uncertainty in the status of many of the populations. Climate change may negatively affect this species over the next several decades. However, the timing and magnitude of potential impacts are largely unknown. Although climate change is listed as a potential threat to the species, it does not affect the overall threat rank or scoring, or the final subnational rank. Survey and monitoring data are needed to be able to determine population levels, assess condition and for assessing population trends. Surveys in potentially suitable habitat are likely to document additional occurrences.
Mountain Lousewort (Pedicularis pulchella) Conservation Status Summary
State Rank: S3
Review Date = 07/24/2026
See the complete Conservation Status Rank Report
How we calculate Conservation Status Ranks
 
General Description
Stems 3–15 cm, often clustered on the caudex. Leaves mainly basal, 2–5 cm long; blades deeply pinnately lobed into lobed and serrate, ovate segments 1–7 mm long. Inflorescence villous, densely flowered, 2–5 cm long; bracts leaf-like. Flowers: calyx purple-veined, 8–10 mm long, 5-lobed, the lobes equal, 2–5 mm long; corolla purple, 18–24 mm long; galea 8–13 mm long, obscurely beaked. Capsule 4-10 mm long (Lesica et al. 2012. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants. BRIT Press. Fort Worth, TX).

Species Range
Montana Range Range Descriptions
Range in Montana
Montana Natural Heritage Program Logo
Native
 


Range Comments
Endemic to southwest MT and adjacent WY (Lesica et al. 2012. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants. BRIT Press. Fort Worth, TX).

Observations in Montana Natural Heritage Program Database
Number of Observations: 29
(Click on the following maps and charts to see full sized version)
Relative Density

Recency

 

(Observations spanning multiple months or years are excluded from time charts)



Habitat
Turf, fellfields, meadows; upper subalpine, alpine (Lesica et al. 2012. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants. BRIT Press. Fort Worth, TX).
Predicted Suitable Habitat Model

This species has a Predicted Suitable Habitat Model available.

To learn how these Models were created see here

Ecological Communities Associated with this Species
Alpine
Alpine - Sparse and Barren
Alpine - Vegetated
Forest and Woodland
Montane - Subalpine Forest and Woodland
Wetland and Riparian
Alpine Riparian and Wetland

Ecology
POLLINATORS
The following animal species have been reported as pollinators of this plant species or its genus where their geographic ranges overlap: Bombus vagans, Bombus appositus, Bombus bifarius, Bombus fervidus, Bombus flavifrons, Bombus frigidus, Bombus melanopygus, Bombus mixtus, Bombus rufocinctus, Bombus sylvicola, Bombus occidentalis, and Bombus kirbiellus (Plath 1934, Macior 1974, Wilson et al. 2010, Miller-Struttmann and Galen 2014, Williams et al. 2014).


References
  • Literature Cited AboveLegend:   View Online Publication
    • Lesica, P., M.T. Lavin, and P.F. Stickney. 2012. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants. Fort Worth, TX: BRIT Press. viii + 771 p.
    • Macior, L.M. 1974. Pollination ecology of the Front Range of the Colorado Rocky Mountains. Melanderia 15: 1-59.
    • Miller-Struttmann, N.E. and C. Galen. 2014. High-altitude multi-taskers: bumble bee food plant use broadens along an altitudinal productivity gradient. Oecologia 176:1033-1045.
    • Plath, O.E. 1934. Bumblebees and their ways. New York, NY: Macmillan Company. 201 p.
    • Williams, P., R. Thorp, L. Richardson, and S. Colla. 2014. Bumble Bees of North America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 208 p.
    • Wilson, J.S., L.E. Wilson, L.D. Loftis, and T. Griswold. 2010. The montane bee fauna of north central Washington, USA, with floral associations. Western North American Naturalist 70(2): 198-207.
  • Additional ReferencesLegend:   View Online Publication
    Do you know of a citation we're missing?
    • Lesica, P., M.T. Lavin, and P.F. Stickney. 2022. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants, Second Edition. Fort Worth, TX: BRIT Press. viii + 779 p.
    • Williams, K.L. 2012. Classification of the grasslands, shrublands, woodlands, forests and alpine vegetation associations of the Custer National Forest portion of the Beartooth Mountains in southcentral Montana. M.Sc. Thesis. Bozeman, MT: Montana State University. 376 p.
  • Web Search Engines for Articles on "Mountain Lousewort"
Login Logout
Citation for data on this website:
Mountain Lousewort — Pedicularis pulchella.  MONTANA FIELD GUIDE™.  .  Retrieved on , from