Search Field Guide
Advanced Search
MT Gov Logo
Montana Field Guide

Montana Field Guides

Dense-flower Rein Orchid - Piperia elongata
Other Names:  Habenaria elegans var. elata, Piperia elegans var. elata

Species of Concern
Native Species

Global Rank: G4
State Rank: S1
(see State Rank Reason below)
State Threat Score: No Known Threats
C-value:


Agency Status
USFWS:
USFS:
BLM:


 

External Links






State Rank Reason (see State Rank above)
In Montana Piperia elongata is known from a single 1957 herbarium specimen collected in Lincoln County, and more recently from a few photographed specimens from Flathead, Lake, and Missoula Counties. However, the more recent observations lack data on population size and extent, habitat condition, threats, and other information. Surveys are needed to better document its status in Montana.
  • Details on Status Ranking and Review
    Dense-flower Rein Orchid (Piperia elongata) Conservation Status Review
    Review Date = 08/29/2016
    View State Conservation Rank Criteria
    Population Size

    ScoreU - Unknown

    Range Extent

    ScoreA - <100 sq km (< ~40 sq mi)

    Area of Occupancy

    ScoreA - 1 4-km2 grid cell

    Number of Populations

    ScoreA - 1 - 5

    Environmental Specificity

    ScoreB - Narrow. Specialist or community with key requirements common

    Long-term Trend

    ScoreU - Unknown

    Trends

    ScoreU - Unknown

    Threats

    ScoreU - Unknown

    CommentThreats: Unknown/undetermined.

    Intrinsic Vulnerability

    ScoreA - Highly vulnerable

 
General Description
PLANTS: Perennial herbaceous stems, 30-40 mm tall, 1-12 mm in diameter (measured above basal leaves). Roots are tubers, 10-40 mm in length, with several fibrous rootlets. Sources: Douglas et al. 2001; Lesica et al. 2012; and Ackerman and Morgan in Flora of North America (FNA) 2002.

LEAVES: Basal, 2 to 5 in number and prostrate. Leaf shape is oblong, 7–15 cm in length, and 1-8.4 cm in width. Cauline leaves 4-22 in number and bract-like. Sources: Douglas et al. 2001; Lesica et al. 2012; and Ackerman and Morgan in FNA 2002.

INFLORESCENCE: A spike-like raceme of overlapping yellow-greenish flowers, 10–20 cm in length. Bracts 9–14 mm in length. Source: Lesica et al. 2012.

Phenology
Flowers May-September (FNA 2002).

Diagnostic Characteristics
Dense Flower Rein Orchid - Piperia elongata, SOC
*Inflorescence: Flowers are sparse to dense, tending to overlap yet not be crowded. Flowers do not spiral on the stem.
*Flowers: Petals and sepals are yellow-green to green.
*Lip petal: Has a long, slender spur, weakly curved spur, 6-15 mm long. The spur is more than twice as long as the lip petal.
*Leaves: Prostrate, but not appressed to the ground. Often withering by the time pollination occurs.

Hillside Rein Orchid - Piperia elegans
*Inflorescence: Flowers are crowded. Flowers do not spiral on the stem.
*Flowers: Petals are white with green sepals.
*Lip petal: Has a long, slender spur, weakly curved spur, 8-12 mm long. The spur is more than twice as long as the lip petal.
*Leaves: Prostrate, but not appressed to the ground. Often withering by the time pollination occurs.

Alaska Rein Orchid - Piperia unalascensis
*Inflorescence: Flowers are well-separated. Flowers do not spiral on the stem.
*Flowers: Petals and sepals are yellow-greenish.
*Lip petal: Has a short spur, clavate (club-shaped), 3-5 mm long. The spur is about as long as the lip petal.
*Leaves: Prostrate, but not appressed to the ground. Often withering by the time pollination occurs.

Bog Orchids - Platanthera species
*Flowers: Arranged in a spike-like raceme, but do not spiral around the stalk.
*Lip petal: Forms a downward pointing spur.
*Leaves: Either near the plant's base (basal) or leafy along entire stem (cauline). If basal than either appressed to the ground or only on the lower stem (lacking upper stem leaves). If cauline then leaves are sheathing, alternately-arranged, and may whither by the time pollination occurs.

Ladies'-tresses - Spiranthes species
*Flowers: Arranged in a spike and spiral on the stalk to form 3- or 4- ranks/columns.
*Lip petal: Lacks a spur.
*Leaves: Relatively long and narrow. Largest at the base, becoming progressively smaller towards the inflorescence. Leaves usually do not whither by the time pollination occurs.

Species Range
Montana Range Range Descriptions

Native
 


Range Comments
Canada: BC; USA: CA, ID, MT, OR, WA (FNA 2002). Known in Montana from one collection in Lincoln County (Lesica 2012).

(Lesica’s contribution from Lesica et al. 2012. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants. BRIT Press. Fort Worth, TX)


Observations in Montana Natural Heritage Program Database
Number of Observations: 5

(Click on the following maps and charts to see full sized version) Map Help and Descriptions
Relative Density

Recency

 

(Observations spanning multiple months or years are excluded from time charts)



Habitat
Moist to wet meadows; valleys (Lesica 2012); dry, exposed habitats, forest chaparral (FNA 2002), shrubby areas, woods and woods edges, from lowland to montane elevations (Douglas et al. 2001).

(Lesica’s contribution from Lesica et al. 2012. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants. BRIT Press. Fort Worth, TX)
Predicted Suitable Habitat Model

This species has a Predicted Suitable Habitat Model available.

To learn how these Models were created see mtnhp.org/models

Reproductive Characteristics
Flowers: Green or yellow-green (Lesica 2012), not scented (Douglas et al. 2001), or if scented, then only faintly at night, sometimes smelling like honey (FNA 2002); sepals 4–6 mm long (Lesica 2012), the upper sepal more or less upright, the lateral sepals somewhat recurved (Douglas et al. 2001); petals sickle-shaped (falcate), 2-5.5 mm long (Douglas et al. 2001); lip petal deltoid-lanceolate, bent back (FNA 2002), 4–6 mm in length; spur weakly curved, 6–15 mm long (Lesica 2012).

Fruit: Capsule ascending to upright (Douglas et al. 2001), 5–10 mm in length (Lesica 2012); seeds brown (FNA 2002).


Threats or Limiting Factors
STATE THREAT SCORE REASON
Threat impact not assigned because threats are not known (MTNHP Threat Assessment 2021).

References
  • Literature Cited AboveLegend:   View Online Publication
    • Douglas, G.W., D. Meidinger, and J. Pojar, editors. 2001. The Illustrated Flora of British Columbia. Volume 7. Monocotyledons (Orchidaceae through Zosteraceae). British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks and British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Victoria. iv + 379 pp.
    • Flora of North America Editorial Committee. 2002. Flora of North America North of Mexico. Vol. 26. Magnoliophyta: Liliidae: Liliales and Orchidales. New York, NY: Oxford Univ. Press. xxvi + 723 pp.
    • Lesica, P., M.T. Lavin, and P.F. Stickney. 2012. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants. Fort Worth, TX: BRIT Press. viii + 771 p.
    • MTNHP Threat Assessment. 2021. State Threat Score Assignment and Assessment of Reported Threats from 2006 to 2021 for State-listed Vascular Plants. Botany Program, Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, Montana.
  • Additional ReferencesLegend:   View Online Publication
    Do you know of a citation we're missing?
    • Lesica, P., M.T. Lavin, and P.F. Stickney. 2022. Manual of Montana Vascular Plants, Second Edition. Fort Worth, TX: BRIT Press. viii + 779 p.
  • Web Search Engines for Articles on "Dense-flower Rein Orchid"
Login Logout
Citation for data on this website:
Dense-flower Rein Orchid — Piperia elongata.  Montana Field Guide.  .  Retrieved on , from