View in other NatureServe Network Field Guides
NatureServe
Montana
Utah
Wyoming
Idaho
Wisconsin
British Columbia
South Carolina
Yukon
California
New York
A Rhyacophilan Caddisfly - Rhyacophila ebria
No photos are currently available
If you have a high quality photo of this species, are confident in the identification, and would like to submit it
for inclusion on the Montana Field Guide, please send it to us using our online photo submission tool.
State Rank Reason (see State Rank above)
This Rhyacophilan Caddisfly is currently ranked a "S1" Species of Concern in MT and is at high risk of extirpation in the state because of very limited and/or potentially declining population numbers, range and/or habitat. Limited sites with small populations, but these insects are also difficult to identify without adult specimens.
General Description
Trichoptera is the largest order of insects that is entirely aquatic, with over 12,600 species worldwide (de Moor and Ivanov 2008). Caddisflies are most closely related to Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), and they share characteristics such as spinning silk. Rhyacophilids make up one of the largest genera of Trichoptera and are some of the most primitive caddisflies. Caddisflies spend most of their life in the water as aquatic larvae and most species build portable, protective cases made from plant material or stones. Most caddisflies either filter small particles from the water by building nets spun from silk or shredded organic matter (e.g., leaves) into smaller pieces. The genus Rhyacophila is a unique group because they do not build portable cases and are mainly predators. Not all Rhyacophila have gills; those lacking gills absorb oxygen through their skin and thus require cold, oxygen-rich, fast-flowing water to breathe. Caddisflies typically have five larval instars before pupation. Despite larvae being free-living, Rhyacophila construct a shelter of small stones tied together with silk for pupation, and the pupa uses its mandibles to break through the case and emerge (Anderson 1976). Adults can live anywhere from a few days to several weeks. Adult caddisflies are medium-sized insects with tent-shaped wings. They resemble moths, but caddisflies do not have a coiled proboscis and their wings are covered in hairs rather than scales. They tend to be secretive and slow-flying riparian insects (Anderson 1976). Rhyacophila usually inhabit cool mountain streams and have small distributions, often restricted to only one or two mountain ranges (Anderson 1976).
Diagnostic Characteristics
Rhyacophila ebria is in the Rotunda group within Rhyacophila . The larvae of this group are similar to the larvae in the Basalis Rhyacophila group, except the underside of their head is the same color as the dorsal surface of their head (Giersch and Wisseman 2012). Larval Rhyacophila ebria are 10-11mm long in their 5th and final instar and its head is as long as it is wide (Stagliano et al. 2007). Larvae have no gills. Giersch and Wisseman (2012) provide a key to identify larval Rhyacophila . Adult R. ebria are mostly dark brown or black, but their spurs are a slightly lighter brown. The length of a male’s forewing measures 7.84mm, and it is uniformly red-brown with dark veins (Nimmo 1977).
Species Range
Montana Range
Range Descriptions
Native
Range Comments
Only species in rotunda group occurring in Montana (Stagliano 2007). Originally described from Glacier Park, Logan Pass, Montana (Denning 1949, Newell and Potter 1973), but subsequently found in Manitoba and British Columbia (Mt. Revelstoke National Park) (Nimmo and Scudder 1978, Scudder 1994). Rhyacophila ebria is reported to be fairly rare and very low in abundance even in the proper habitat. Montana collections only, adults (Denning 1949) and larvae (Giersch 2002).
Observations in Montana Natural Heritage Program Database
Number of Observations: 53
(Click on the following maps and charts to see full sized version)
Map Help and Descriptions
Relative Density
Recency
(Observations spanning multiple months or years are excluded from time charts)
Habitat
Rhyacophila ebria occurs in the highest, coldest streams fed by snowmelt, glaciers, or icefield in the northern Rocky Mountains (Stagliano et al. 2007, Giersch and Wisseman 2012). These streams range from small, turbulent creeks to tiny alpine trickles (Nimmo 1971).
Little is known about exactly what water temperatures this species inhabits; however, another
Rhyacophila species (
Rhyacophila vao ) was recorded in a stream with an average annual water temperature of 3.7?. Additionally,
R. vao ) was found to not pupate until stream temperature exceeded 3? (Dixon and Wrona 1992).
More sensitive taxa (mayflies, caddisflies, and stoneflies) are usually found in areas with less deposited sediment, while the abundance of tolerant taxa (fingernail clams, scuds, and non-biting midges) increases with the percent of fine sediment in the stream (Waters 1995, Cole et al. 2003).
When timber harvest and forest regeneration is concerned, many studies have found that macroinvertebrate densities decrease as forest stand age increases. However, these young stands exhibit higher dominance by just a few taxa that are tolerant to disturbance due to increased solar radiation increasing primary production (Cole et al. 2003). Older stands show lower dominance of tolerant taxa likely because stream conditions are more stable, thus allowing the abundance of sensitive taxa like caddisflies to increase.
Food Habits
Larval Rhyacophilids are predaceous, but their feeding patterns change as they grow. Larvae in early instars tend to have a diet dominated by moss, diatoms, and detritus, but then eat more animal material after the third instar. Later instars of Rhyacophila mainly eat Chironomidae (non-biting midge) and other small fly larvae, Ephemeroptera (mayfly), Plecoptera (stonefly), other Trichopterans, Copepoda (crustacean), Acari (water mite), and even fish eggs (Thut 1969, Dudgeon and Richardson 1988). Rather than engulfing their prey whole, larval Rhyacophila only consume the soft parts of their prey, discarding tougher structures like legs and head capsules (Giersch 2002). Little is known about the diet of adult Rhyacophila , but other adult caddisflies do not have developed mouthparts and only eat nectar or sap from plants during their short time as an adult.
Ecology
Rhyacophila species are often sympatric, with several species occurring together at one site (Giersch 2002).
Reproductive Characteristics
The lifecycle of R. ebria has not been studied. Most caddisflies have a one-year life cycle, though some species reproduce more than once per year and others require two years to fully develop. Some species that are univoltine in lower elevation temperate streams may be semivoltine (more than one year) at higher latitudes or elevations where the growing season is too short for larvae to complete development in one year (Giersch 2002). After a short pupation phase,Rhyacophila transitions from the aquatic to the terrestrial environment. Adult R. ebria emerge in August through early October (Nimmo 1977, Stagliano et al. 2007). The remainder of their lives are spent mating and reproducing. Adult caddisflies lay their eggs in or near water, either as strings surrounded by a cement-like matrix or as gelatinous masses (Anderson 1976). As adults, they use trees as roosting places. Caddisfly adults tend to remain near the emergence site where oviposition occurs. Although dispersal flights are common, they are relatively short and only occur immediately following emergence. Dispersal from emergence sites tends to be negatively correlated with vegetation density (Collier and Smith 1998). In other words, caddisflies tend to disperse shorter distances in dense forest compared with more open areas.
Management
R. ebria is a regional endemic only known to occur in high alpine snowmelt and spring fed streams along the Rocky Mountain Cordillera in Glacier National Park of Montana and Waterton, Banff, and Jasper National Parks of Alberta and British Columbia. With the increased evidence of global warming, this species could be considered a candidate for the USFWS Threatened and Endangered species list.
Stewardship Responsibility
Threats or Limiting Factors
Specific threats to Montana populations of R. ebria would include rising air temperatures and the melting of glaciers. When the existing glaciers disappear from Glacier National Park, this species may go extinct. In general, cold-water invertebrate specialists are affected by changes to aquatic habitat, such as alteration of flow patterns, streambed substrate, thermal characteristics, and water quality (Stagliano et al. 2007). Rhyacophila ebria is fairly rare and very low in abundance, even in suitable habitat.
References
Literature Cited AboveLegend: View Online Publication Anderson, N.H. 1976. The distribution and biology of the Oregon Trichoptera. Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin 134:1-152. Cole, M.B., K.R. Russell, and T.J. Mabee. 2003. Relation of headwater macroinvertebrate communities to in-stream and adjacent stand characteristics in managed second-growth forests of the Oregon Coast Range mountains. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33:1433-1443. Collier, K.J. and B.J. Smith. 1998. Dispersal of adult caddisflies (Trichoptera) into forests alongside three New Zealand streams. Hydrobiologia, 361: 53-65. de Moor, F.C. and V.C. Ivanov. 2008. Global diversity of caddisflies (Trichoptera: Insecta) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595:393-407. Denning, D. G. 1949. New species of nearctic caddisflies. Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society 44:37-48. Dixon, R.W.J. and F.J. Wrona. 1992. Life history and production of the predatory caddisfly Rhyacophila vao Milne in a spring-fed stream. Freshwater Biology 27:1-11. Dudgeon, D. And J.S. Richardson. 1988. Dietary variations of predaceous caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera: Rhyacophilidae, Polycentropodidae and Arctopsychidae) from British Columbian streams. Hydrobiologia 160(1):33-43. Giersch, J. and R. Wisseman. 2012. Annotated list of Rhyacophila of North America with larval key and descriptions. U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Assoc. of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists Workshop 2012. 133 p. Giersch, J. J. 2002. Revision and phylogenetic analysis of the verrula and alberta species group of Rhyacophila pictet 1834 with description of a new species (Trichoptera: Rhyacophilidae). Master's of Science Thesis. Montana State University, Bozeman, MT. 206 pp. Merritt, R.W. and K.W. Cummins. 1996. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. 3rd Edition. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company. Dubuque, Iowa. 862 pp. Newell, R.L. and D.S. Potter. 1973. Distribution of some Montana caddisflies. Proceedings of the Montana Academy of Sciences 33:12-21. Nimmo, A.P. 1971. The adult Rhyacophilidae and Limnephilidae (Trichoptera ) of Alberta and eastern British Columbia and their post-glacial origin. Quaestiones Entomologicae 7: 3-234. Nimmo, A.P. 1977. The adult Trichoptera (insecta) of Aberta and British Columbia, and their post-glacial origins. The families Rhyacophilidae and Limnephilidae. Supplement. Queastiones Entomologicae 13: 25-67. Nimmo, A.P. and G.G.E. Scudder. 1978. An annotated checklist of the Trichoptera (Insecta) of British Columbia. Syesis 11: 117-134. Peck, D. and S. Smith. 1977. A revision of the Rhyacophila coloradensis complex (Trichoptera: Rhyacophilidae) [North America]. Melanderia (USA) 27:1-24. Scudder, G. G. E. 1994. An annotated systematic list of the potentially rare and endangered freshwater and terrestrial invertebrates in British Columbia. Entomological Society of British Columbia Occasional Paper 2:1-92. Smith, S.D. 1968. The Rhyacophila of the Salmon River drainage of Idaho with special reference to larvae. Annals Entomol. Sot. Amer. 61(3): 655-674. Stagliano, D.M., G.M. Stephens, and W.R. Bosworth. 2007. Aquatic invertebrate species of concern on USFS northern region lands. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, Montana and Idaho Conservation Data Center, Boise, Idaho. 153 p. Thut, R.N. 1969. Feeding habits of larvae of seven Rhyacophila (Trichoptera:Rhyacophilidae) species with notes on other life-history features. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 62(4):894-898. Waters, T.F. 1995. Sediment in streams: Sources, biological effects, and control. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. Monograph 7. Wold, J.L. 1973. Systematics of the genus Rhyacophila (Trichoptera; Rhyacophilidae) in western North America with special reference to the immature stages. M.Sc. Thesis. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. 229 p.
Additional ReferencesLegend: View Online Publication Do you know of a citation we're missing? Muhlfeld, C.C., T.J. Cline, J.J. Giersch, E. Peitzsch, C. Florentine, D. Jacobsen, and S. Hotaling. 2020. Specialized meltwater biodiversity persists despite widespread deglaciation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences May 2020, 202001697; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2001697117 Wold, J.L. 1974. Systematics of the genus Rhyacophila (Trichoptera: rhyacophilidae) in western North America with special reference to the immature stages. M.S. thesis. Oregon State Univ., Corvallis 229 pp.
Web Search Engines for Articles on "A Rhyacophilan Caddisfly"
Additional Sources of Information Related to "Insects"