Montana Field Guide

Trichoptera is the largest order of insects that is entirely aquatic, with over 12,600 species worldwide (de Moor and Ivanov 2008). Caddisflies are most closely related to Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), and they share characteristics such as spinning silk. Rhyacophilids make up one of the largest genera of Trichoptera and are some of the most primitive caddisflies.

Caddisflies spend most of their life in the water as aquatic larvae and most species build portable, protective cases made from plant material or stones. Most caddisflies either filter small particles from the water by building nets spun from silk or shredded organic matter (e.g., leaves) into smaller pieces. The genus Rhyacophila is a unique group because they do not build portable cases and are mainly predators. Not all Rhyacophila have gills; those lacking gills absorb oxygen through their skin and thus require cold, oxygen-rich, fast-flowing water to breathe.

Caddisflies typically have five larval instars before pupation. Despite larvae being free-living, Rhyacophila construct a shelter of small stones tied together with silk for pupation, and the pupa uses its mandibles to break through the case and emerge (Anderson 1976). Adults can live anywhere from a few days to several weeks.

Adult caddisflies are medium-sized insects with tent-shaped wings. They resemble moths, but caddisflies do not have a coiled proboscis and their wings are covered in hairs rather than scales. They tend to be secretive and slow-flying riparian insects (Anderson 1976). Rhyacophila usually inhabit cool mountain streams and have small distributions, often restricted to only one or two mountain ranges (Anderson 1976).

Rhyacophila oreia is part of the Rhyacophila Visor group. The male genitalic characters of the species are reduced in this group, making their phylogeny difficult to place (Giersch and Wisseman 2012). The larvae of the Visor group are about 8-15mm long in their 5th and final instar, and their head is widest posteriorly, and slightly wedge-shaped and elongate. The Visor group lacks gills like most Rhyacophila groups, but they do have a unique oblique suture on the lateral sclerite. Giersch and Wisseman (2012) provide a key to identify larval Rhyacophila.

Rhyacophila oreia larvae have not been described, so the only larval description is based on the sclerites remaining in its pupal case (Wold 1973). Rhyacophila oreia larvae do not have gills and their head, thorax, and pronotum are yellow-brown. Their head narrows anteriorly when viewed dorsally and the frontoclypeus is slightly darker than the rest of the head. For a more detailed description of distinguishing features that occur in the male and female genitalia, see Wold (1973).

Adults of R. oreia have not been described.

Little is known about exactly what water temperatures this species inhabits; however, another Rhyacophila species (Rhyacophila vao) was recorded in a stream with an average annual water temperature of 3.7?. Additionally, R. vao was found to not pupate until stream temperature exceeded 3? (Dixon and Wrona 1992).

More sensitive taxa (mayflies, caddisflies, and stoneflies) are usually found in areas with less deposited sediment, while the abundance of tolerant taxa (fingernail clams, scuds, and non-biting midges) increases with the percent of fine sediment in the stream (Waters 1995, Cole et al. 2003).

When timber harvest and forest regeneration is concerned, many studies have found that macroinvertebrate densities decrease as forest stand age increases; however, these young stands exhibit higher dominance by just a few taxa that are tolerant to disturbance due to increased solar radiation increasing primary production (Cole et al. 2003). Older stands show lower dominance of tolerant taxa likely because stream conditions are more stable, thus allowing the abundance of sensitive taxa like caddisflies to increase.

Larval Rhyacophilids are predaceous, but their feeding patterns change as they grow. Larvae in early instars tend to have a diet dominated by moss, diatoms, and detritus, but then eat more animal material after the third instar. Later instars of Rhyacophila eat Chironomidae (non-biting midge) and other small fly larvae, Ephemeroptera (mayfly), Plecoptera (stonefly), other Trichopterans, Copepoda (crustacean), Acari (water mite), and even fish eggs (Thut 1969, Dudgeon and Richardson 1988). Rather than engulfing their prey whole, larval Rhyacophila only consume the soft parts of their prey, discarding tougher structures like legs and head capsules (Giersch 2002).

Little is known about the diet of adult Rhyacophila, but other adult caddisflies do not have developed mouthparts and only eat nectar or sap from plants during their adult lifespan.

Rhyacophila species are often sympatric, with several species occurring together at one site (Giersch 2002).

The lifecycle of R. oreia has not been studied. Most caddisflies have a one-year life cycle, though some species reproduce more than once per year and others require two years to fully develop. Some species that are univoltine in lower elevation temperate streams may be semivoltine (more than one year) at higher latitudes or elevations where the growing season is too short for larvae to complete development in one year (Giersch 2002). After a short pupation phase, Rhyacophila transitions from the aquatic to the terrestrial environment. Adult R. oreia pupate in June and emerge in June through autumn (Wold 1973). The remainder of their lives are spent mating and reproducing. Adult caddisflies lay their eggs in or near water, either as strings surrounded by a cement-like matrix or as gelatinous masses (Anderson 1976). As adults, they use trees as roosting places.

Caddisfly adults tend to remain near the emergence site where oviposition occurs. Although dispersal flights are common, they are relatively short and only occur immediately following emergence. Dispersal from emergence sites tends to be negatively correlated with vegetation density (Collier and Smith 1998). In other words, caddisflies tend to disperse shorter distances in dense forest compared with more open areas.

Limited data and the inability to identify larval collections has lead to a low global rank. Distribution data for U.S. states and Canadian provinces is known to be incomplete or has not been reviewed for this taxon.

There are no known threats to Rhyacophila oreia, but threats to many Rhyacophila in Montana include sediment and temperature increases resulting from road building, timber harvests, and other disturbances in forested riparian areas (Stagliano et al. 2007). Global climate change is also predicted to pose a threat to R. oreia and other cold-water, mountain stream insects.