Northern Bog Lemming - Synaptomys borealis
The Northern Bog Lemming has a grizzled reddish-brown coat on the back that grades to gray on the belly; the coat is relatively long and loose. The ears extend noticeably beyond the body fur and are sparsely haired on the edge. The tail is extremely short. There are 16 teeth in the skull (dental formula: I 1/1, C 0/0, P 0/0, M 3/3), with the upper incisors broadly grooved. Body measurements are: total length 120 millimeters, tail 21 to 23 millimeters, hind foot 18 to 19 millimeters, and mass 22 to 25 grams (Foresman 2012).
The Northern Bog Lemming can be distinguished from all other mice and voles in Montana by a combination of a very short tail (equal to or only slightly longer than the hind foot), broad shallow grooves on the outer surface of the upper incisors, and the deep reentrant angles on the outer side of the upper cheek teeth and the inner side of the lower cheek teeth (Foresman 2012, 2001).
Western Hemisphere Range
Summary of Observations Submitted for Montana
Number of Observations:
(Click on the following maps and charts to see full sized version)
Map Help and Descriptions
(Records associated with a range of dates are excluded from time charts)
No information on movement is available for Montana.
Northern Bog Lemmings in Montana have been found in at least nine community types, including Engelmann spruce, subalpine fir, birch, willow, sedge (Carex), spikerush (Eleocharis), or combinations of the above, often occurring in wet meadows, fens, or bog-like environments. Wright (1950) captured lemmings in a swampy area containing spruce trees, timothy, alder and other moist-site plants (Wright 1950). The Upper Rattlesnake Creek specimen was captured in a wet-sedge/bluejoint meadow near subalpine fir (Adelman 1979). Areas with extensive moss mats, primarily sphagnum, are the most likely sites in which to find new populations (Wright 1950, Reichel and Beckstrom 1994, Reichel and Corn 1997, Pearson 1999, Foresman 2012).
Throughout their range a variety of habitats are occupied, especially near the southern edge of the global distribution, and include sphagnum bogs, wet meadows, moist mixed and coniferous forests, montane sedge meadows, krummholz spruce-fir forest with dense herbaceous and mossy understory, alpine tundra, mossy streamsides, and even sagebrush slopes in the case of S. b. artemisiae in British Columbia (Clough and Albright 1987, West 1999). Typically, occupied habitat has high moisture levels. The Northern Bog Lemming occupies burrow systems up to a foot deep, and also surface runways. Young are born in nests that may be underground or on the surface in concealing vegetation.
Ecological Systems Associated with this Species
- Details on Creation and Suggested Uses and Limitations
How Associations Were Made
We associated the use and habitat quality (high, medium, or low) of each of the 82 ecological systems mapped in Montana for
vertebrate animal species that regularly breed, overwinter, or migrate through the state by:
- Using personal observations and reviewing literature that summarize the breeding, overwintering, or migratory habitat requirements of each species (Dobkin 1992, Hart et al. 1998, Hutto and Young 1999, Maxell 2000, Foresman 2001, Adams 2003, and Werner et al. 2004);
- Evaluating structural characteristics and distribution of each ecological system relative to the species’ range and habitat requirements;
- Examining the observation records for each species in the state-wide point database associated with each ecological system;
- Calculating the percentage of observations associated with each ecological system relative to the percent of Montana covered by each ecological system to get a measure of “observations versus availability of habitat”.
Species that breed in Montana were only evaluated for breeding habitat use, species that only overwinter in Montana were only evaluated for overwintering habitat use, and species that only migrate through Montana were only evaluated for migratory habitat use.
In general, species were associated as using an ecological system if structural characteristics of used habitat documented in the literature were present in the ecological system or large numbers of point observations were associated with the ecological system.
However, species were not associated with an ecological system if there was no support in the literature for use of structural characteristics in an ecological system, even if
point observations were associated with that system.
High, medium, and low habitat quality was assigned based on the degree to which the structural characteristics of an ecological system matched the preferred structural habitat characteristics for each species in the literature.
The percentage of observations associated with each ecological system relative to the percent of Montana covered by each ecological system was also used to guide assignments of habitat quality.
If you have any questions or comments on species associations with ecological systems, please contact Bryce Maxell at firstname.lastname@example.org
or (406) 444-3655.
Suggested Uses and Limitations
Species associations with ecological systems should be used to generate potential lists of species that may occupy broader landscapes for the purposes of landscape-level planning.
These potential lists of species should not be used in place of documented occurrences of species (this information can be requested at: http://mtnhp.org/requests/default.asp
) or systematic surveys for species and evaluations of habitat at a local site level by trained biologists.
Users of this information should be aware that the land cover data used to generate species associations is based on imagery from the late 1990s and early 2000s and was only intended to be used at broader landscape scales.
Land cover mapping accuracy is particularly problematic when the systems occur as small patches or where the land cover types have been altered over the past decade.
Thus, particular caution should be used when using the associations in assessments of smaller areas (e.g., evaluations of public land survey sections).
Finally, although a species may be associated with a particular ecological system within its known geographic range, portions of that ecological system may occur outside of the species’ known geographic range.
- Adams, R.A. 2003. Bats of the Rocky Mountain West; natural history, ecology, and conservation. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado. 289 p.
- Dobkin, D. S. 1992. Neotropical migrant land birds in the Northern Rockies and Great Plains. USDA Forest Service, Northern Region. Publication No. R1-93-34. Missoula, MT.
- Foresman, K.R. 2001. The wild mammals of Montana. Special Publication No. 12. Lawrence, KS: The American Society of Mammalogists. 278 p.
- Hart, M.M., W.A. Williams, P.C. Thornton, K.P. McLaughlin, C.M. Tobalske, B.A. Maxell, D.P. Hendricks, C.R. Peterson, and R.L. Redmond. 1998. Montana atlas of terrestrial vertebrates. Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, University of Montana, Missoula, MT. 1302 p.
- Hutto, R.L. and J.S. Young. 1999. Habitat relationships of landbirds in the Northern Region, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station RMRS-GTR-32. 72 p.
- Maxell, B.A. 2000. Management of Montana’s amphibians: a review of factors that may present a risk to population viability and accounts on the identification, distribution, taxonomy, habitat use, natural history, and the status and conservation of individual species. Report to U.S. Forest Service Region 1. Missoula, MT: Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana. 161 p.
- Werner, J.K., B.A. Maxell, P. Hendricks, and D. Flath. 2004. Amphibians and reptiles of Montana. Missoula, MT: Mountain Press Publishing Company. 262 p.
Northern Bog Lemmings feed on grasses, sedges, and other herbaceous vegetation, but also snails, slugs, and other invertebrates (West 1999, Foresman 2012). In Montana, diet (7 stomachs from 7 sites) includes at least 17 moss species, making up an average 59% of the stomach contents (Reichel et al. in preparation).
The Northern Bog Lemming is active throughout the year, and apparently during both day and night. It maintains a home range of probably less than 1 acre, although data regarding movements are unavailable. Population densities may range up to 36 per acre. It is very sociable and may be found in small colonies. Other small mammals present at Northern Bog Lemming sites in Montana include shrews (Sorex vagrans, S. palustris) and voles (Microtis pennsylvanicus, M. richarsoni, M. longicaudus, Clethrionomys gapperi) (Wright 1950, Reichel and Beckstrom 1994). Predators in Montana include Martens (Martes americana) and Terrestrial Gartersnakes (Thamnophis elegans) (Hoffmann et al. 1969).
Information on reproduction in Montana is very limited. Scrotal males have been captured on June 16, July 26 and August 29 in Lincoln County, and pregnant females in Lewis and Clark County on August 31 (Reichel and Beckstrom 1994). One litter from Montana numbered 3 (Reichel and Beckstrom 1993). Information from other portions of their range indicates Northern Bog Lemmings breed from late April to early October, with most occurring May through August (based on 178 museum specimens from across the global range) (James D. Reichel, unpublished data). Gestation probably lasts 3 weeks. Litter size ranges 2 to 9, with an average of 4 (mean of 3.98 embryos and 3.75 placental scars in 69 museum specimens) (James D. Reichel, unpublished data). Two or three litters per year are capable of being produced (West 1999); at least some individuals breed during the summer of their birth.
No special management activities have been developed or implemented for this species in Montana. Nevertheless, some populations on U.S.D.A. Forest Service lands are provided added protection through special management/conservation policy guidelines applied to peatlands, including Research Natural Area (RNA) designation (Chadde et al. 1998). Peatlands with RNA designation typically disallow manipulative management, such as timber harvest and livestock grazing, and water quality of these peatlands is protected under the Clean Water Act and state water quality standards. Protection guidelines (Reichel and Corn 1997) should be applied to all sites where Northern Bog Lemmings are known to occur, as well as potential peatland sites not yet surveyed for them. Guidelines include 1) assumption that Northern Bog Lemmings are present at sphagnum or fen moss habitat patches unless site-specific surveys indicate otherwise, 2) restriction of timber harvest to a zone beyond a 100 meter buffer surrounding sphagnum or other fen moss mats, or associated riparian areas which could provide corridors for dispersal to adjacent patches of suitable habitat, 3) minimizing livestock grazing in drainages with unsurveyed moss mats present, and maintaining range conditions there and in those with populations present at good to excellent, and 4) elimination of management activities that could destroy moss mats (road-building, pothole blasting, trail construction, dam construction, alteration of surface and subsurface waterflow, recreational vehicle use in fen habitats). Additional surveys should be undertaken to better understand the macro- and micro-distribution in Montana, and known sites should be monitored routinely to determine population persistence and trends.
- Literature Cited AboveLegend: View WorldCat Record View Online Publication
- Adelman, E. B. 1979. A survey of the nongame mammals in the Upper Rattlesnake Creek drainage of western Montana. M.S. thesis. University of Montana, Missoula. 129 p.
- Chadde, S. W., J. S. Shelly, R. J. Bursik, R. K Moseley, A. G. Evenden, M. Mantas, F. Rabe, and B. Heide. 1998. Peatlands on national forests of the northern Rocky Mountains: ecology and conservation. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-11. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT. 75 p.
- Clough, G. C. and J. J. Albright. 1987. Occurrence of the northern bog lemming, Synaptomys borealis, in the northeastern United States. Canadian Field-Naturalist 101:611-613.
- Foresman, K. R. 2001. Key to the mammals of Montana. University of Montana Bookstore, Missoula, Montana. 92 p.
- Foresman, K. R. 2012. Mammals of Montana. Second edition. Mountain Press Publishing, Missoula, Montana. 429 p.
- Hoffmann, R.S., P.L. Wright, and F.E. Newby. 1969. Distribution of some mammals in Montana. I. Mammals other than bats. Journal of Mammalogy 50(3): 579-604.
- Pearson, D. E. 1999. Small mammals of the Bitterroot National Forest: a literature review and annotated bibliography. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-25. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 63 p.
- Reichel, J. D. and J. G. Corn. 1997. Northern bog lemmings: survey, population parameters, and population analysis. Unpublished report to the Kootenai National Forest. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 27 p.
- Reichel, J. D., J. C. Elliott, and P. Hendricks. In preparation. Mosses: an important food of northern bog lemmings in Montana.
- Reichel, J.D. and S.G. Beckstrom. 1993. Northern bog lemming survey: 1992. Unpublished report. Montana Natural Heritage Program, Helena, MT. 64 p.
- Reichel, J.D. and S.G. Beckstrom. 1994. Northern bog lemming survey: 1993. Unpublished report. Montana Natural Heritage Program. Helena, MT. 87 p.
- West, S. D. 1999. Northern bog lemming Synaptomys borealis. In: D. E. Wilson and S. Ruff, eds. The Smithsonian book of North American mammals. pp. 655-656. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
- Wright, P.L. 1950. Synaptomys borealis from Glacier National Park, Montana. Journal of Mammalogy 31(4): 460.
- Additional ReferencesLegend: View WorldCat Record View Online Publication
Do you know of a citation we're missing?
- Abstracts from Montana Rare Animal Meeting. 1992. [November 5-6, 1992]. Lewistown, MT. 20 pp.
- Anderson, S. 1962. A new northern record of SYNAPTOMYS BOREALIS in Ungava. J. Mammal. 43:421-422.
- Banfield, A. W. F. 1974. The mammals of Canada. University of Toronto Press for National Museum of Natural Science and the National Museums of Canada, 438 p.
- Cross, E. C. 1938. SYNAPTOMYS BOREALIS from Godbout, Quebec. J. Mammal. 19:378.
- Dice, L.R. 1923. Mammal associations and habitats of the Flathead Lake Region, Montana. Ecology 4(3):247-260.
- Flath, Dennis L., 1979, Nongame species of special interest or concern: Mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fishes. January 1979.
- Foresman, K. R. 2001. The wild mammals of Montana. American Society of Mammologists, Special Publication Number 12. Lawrence, KS. 278 p.
- Groves, C. and E. Yensen. 1989. Rediscovery of the northern bog lemming (Synaptomys borealis) in Idaho. Northw. Nat. 70:14-15.
- Hall, E. R. 1981. Mammals of North America, 2nd edition. (2 vols.). John Wiley and Sons, New York. 1181 p.
- Hall, E. R. 1981. The mammals of North America, volumes I and II. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. 1181 p.
- Hoffmann, R. S. and D. L. Pattie. 1968. A guide to Montana mammals: identification, habitat, distribution, and abundance. University of Montana, Missoula. 133 p.
- Jones, J. K., Jr., R. S. Hoffman, D. W. Rice, C. Jones, R. J. Baker, and M. D. Engstrom. 1992. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occasional Papers, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 146:1-23.
- Jonkel, C. J. 1959. An ecological and physiological study of pine marten. M.S. thesis. Montana State Univ., Missoula. 81 pp.
- Koenigswald, W. von, and L. D. Martin. 1984. Revision of the fossil Lemminae (Rodentia, Mammalia). Spec. Publ. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist. 9:122-137.
- Kritzman, Ellen B. 1977. Little mammals of the Pacific Northwest. Pacific Search Press, Seattle, WA.
- Layser, E. F. and T. E. Burke. 1973. The northern bog lemming and its unique habitat in northeastern Washington. Murrelet 54:7-8.
- Layser, E. F. and T. E. Burke. 1973. The northern bog lemming and its unique habitat in northeastern Washington. Murrelet 54:7-8.
- Martell, A. M. 1974. A northern range extension for the northern bog lemming, SYNAPTOMYS BOREALIS BOREALIS (Richardson). Can. Field-Nat. 88:348.
- Mead, J. I., C. J. Bell, and L. K. Murray. 1992. MICTOMYS BOREALIS (northern bog lemming) and the Wisconsin paleoecology of the east-central Great Basin. Quaternary Res. 37:229-238.
- Pearson, D. E. 1991. The northern bog lemming in Montana and the contiguous United States: distribution, ecology and relic species theory. Senior thesis, Univ. of Montana, Missoula. 33 pp.
- Prince, L. A. 1942. SYNAPTOMYS BOREALIS from Fort Severn, Hudson Bay, Ontario. J. Mammal. 23:216.
- Reichel, J. D. 1996. Northern bog lemming survey: 1995. Montana Natural Heritage Program. Helena, MT. 35 pp.
- Reichel, James., 1996, Annotated bibiliography of bog lemmings.
- Reid, F. 2006. Peterson Field Guide to Mammals of North America, 4th Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston and New York, 608 pp.
- Weckwerth, R. P. and V. D. Hawley. 1962. Marten food habits and population fluctuations in Montana. J. Wildl. Manage. 26(1): 55-74.
- Wetzel, R. M. and H. L. Gunderson. 1949. The lemming vole, SYNAPTOMYS BOREALIS, in northern Minnesota. J. Mammal. 30:437.
- Wilson, C., R. E. Johnson and J. D. Reichel. 1980. New records for the northern bog lemming in Washington. Murrelet 61:104-106.
- Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Second Edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp.