Search Field Guide
Montana Animal Field Guide

Montana Field Guides

Black-tailed Prairie Dog - Cynomys ludovicianus

Black-tail Prairie Dog - Black-tail Prairie Dog
Black-tail Prairie Dog
Prairie Dog close-up photo - Close- up of Prarie Dog at burrow opening Black-tail Prairie Dog - Black-tail Prairie Dog Black-tailed Prairie Dog call - Copyright by Borror Laboratory of Bioacoustics, Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, all rights reserved.
Google for more images Google for web pages
Species of Concern

Global Rank: G4
State Rank: S3

Agency Status
USFWS: none
USFS: SENSITIVE
BLM: SENSITIVE
CFWCS Tier: 1



 

General Description
The black-tailed prairie dog is the largest of the prairie dog species, weighing 700 to 1500 grams and measuring 28 to 33 centimeters from nose to tail (Burt and Grossenheider 1976, Hoogland and Foltz 1982). The overall color of the back and upper sides of the body and tail is generally dark cinnamon with buff coloring on the underside (Burt and Grossenheider 1976, Anderson 1972, Hall 1981). The distal third of the tail is black or dark brown (Hall 1981). They molt twice per year, prior to summer and prior to winter. The skull is about 60 centimeters long, with 22 teeth (Burt and Grossenheider 1976).

Diagnostic Characteristics
Black-tailed prairie dogs are easily separated from the similar white-tailed prairie dogs by the black color of the distal one-third of the tail tip. The black-tailed prairie dog also lacks the distinctive dark face patches of the white-tailed prairie dog. Black-tailed prairie dogs are also found in more dense colonies than are white-tailed prairie dogs. Features of the skull and teeth can also be used to separate the two species of prairie dogs in Montana (Foreseman 2001).

Prairie dogs may also be confused with a number of ground squirrel (Spermophilus) species, but are distinguished by their much more robust body conformation and relatively short tail and their habit of living in much denser colonies with more developed burrow systems.

Distribution
Montana Range





Migration
Black-tailed prairie dogs are not known to migrate, but young animals, primarily males, disperse from their natal burrows in May or June shortly after emerging from hibernation (Garrett and Franklin 1988). Males also disperse from their breeding territory after 2 years to avoid inbreeding with their two year old daughters (Hoogland 1995). Most dispersers remain in the home colony (Hoogland 1995), but others move up to 6 miles in search of new colonies (Knowles 1984).

Habitat
Prairie dog colonies are found on flat, open grasslands and shrub/grasslands with low, relatively sparse vegetation. The most frequently occupied habitat in Montana is dominated by western wheatgrass, blue grama and big sagebrush (Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks 2002). Colonies are associated with silty clay loams, sandy clay loams, and loams (Thorp 1949, Bonham and Lerwick 1976, Klatt and Hein 1978, Agnew et al. 1986) and fine to medium textured soils are preferred (Merriam 1902, Thorp 1949, Koford 1958), presumably because burrows and other structures tend to retain their shape and strength better than in coarse, loose soils. Encroachment into sands (e.g., loamy fine sand) occurs if the habitat is needed for colony expansion (Osborn 1942).

Shallow slopes of less than 10% are preferred (Koford 1958, Hillman et al. 1979, Dalsted et al. 1981), presumably in part because such areas drain well and are only slightly prone to flooding. By colonizing areas with low vegetative stature, prairie dogs often select areas with past human (as well as animal) disturbance. In Montana, colonies tended to be associated with areas heavily used by cattle, such as water tanks and long-term supplemental feeding sites (Licht and Sanchez 1993, FaunaWest 1998).

Food Habits
Prairie dogs prefer grasses, focusing their herbivory on leaf bases (Koford 1958, Hansen and Gold 1977, Uresk 1984, Krueger 1986). The proportion of other forage types in the diet varies with season, location on town, and vegetative composition (Koford 1958, Hansen and Gold 1977, Uresk 1984, Krueger 1986, Summers and Linder 1978, Bonham and Lerwick 1976, Fagerstone et al. 1981). A 950-gram prairie dog consumes roughly 2.2 pounds of dry laboratory feed per month, or 26.4 pounds per year (Hansen and Cavender 1973 in Hansen and Gold 1977). In terms of forage consumption, Merriam (1902) and Koford (1958) estimated the number of prairie dogs equivalent to one animal unit (A.U.) to be 256 and 335, respectively. Prairie dogs apparently do not require free water (Merriam 1902, Bintz 1984). Water is obtained from green grass and forb shoots (green grasses contain about 68 to 77% water) (Bintz 1984), and, in winter, from succulents such as Opuntia spp., which are about 80% water (Summers and Linder 1978, Fagerstone et al. 1981).

Ecology
Disperal is heavily biased toward 1 to 2 year old males (Hoogland 1995). Intercolony dispersers may move up to 5 kilometers (Garrett and Franklin 1988). Dispersal was verified in 2 of 1200 marked animals in South Dakota: 1 moved 1 kilometer, the other 2 kilometers (Hoogland 1995). Other species are important in prairie ecosystem--Burrowing Owls, Mountain Plovers, and black-footed ferrets--and depend on prairie dog towns.

General information on black-tailed prarie dogs is available.

The basic prairie dog family group (the coterie) comprises one adult male (at least 2 years old), three or four adult females, and several yearlings or juveniles (Hoogland and Foltz 1982). Large coteries with two or more males occasionally occur. Females remain in their coterie for life, whereas males usually leave within 12 to 14 months after weaning. The coterie system deteriorates in spring during gestation and lactation (King 1959). An organizational level higher than the coterie is the ward (King 1959), a town subdivision described according to topographic features.

Nonexpanding colonies fluctuate significantly between years under normal conditions (King 1959, Koford 1958, O'Meilia et al. 1982, Powell, unpubl. mans.). Spring counts revealed 252 prairie dogs in one year and 92 four years later (Hoogland et al. 1988). Over a 10-year period, the number of weaned juveniles ranged from 4 to 133. Expanding colonies can grow enormously in a few years, increasing population levels 30 to 295% (Hansen and Gold 1977, Garrett and Franklin 1988, Reading et al. 1989). Human control efforts and plague cause substantial fluctuations in population size (see later sections for detailed discussions). In areas where immigration of new individuals is successful, genetic variability within a population is not decreased by large population reductions (Daley 1992).

Under normal conditions, without catastrophic factors operating (e.g., plague or severe predation), rates of mortality vary substantially from year to year, both within and between cohorts (King 1959, Koford 1958, Hoogland et al. 1988). First year survival averaged 50 to 56% for males and females but ranged from 32 to 79% over a 5-year period (Hoogland et al. 1988). Mortality levels drop greatly after the first year, with males typically living to 3 to 4 years and females to 4 to 5 years. King (1955, in Koford 1958) observed 44% mortality in one population, with 36% mortality in the juvenile cohort followed by 22% mortality in the same cohort the following year.

Sylvatic plague is extremely important where it occurs. Sylvatic (bubonic) plague is an exotic disease that can kill more than 99% of prairie dogs in a colony (Cully 1989). The plague bacteria (Yersinia pestis) is transmitted animal-to-animal by infected fleas or contact with infected blood or tissue. The significance of plague in range-wide prairie dog mortality is unclear, though experts agree that where plague occurs it is extremely important in population dynamics (Cully 1992, Brown 1992). Plague may be introduced into a colony by other species or by dispersing prairie dogs, which bring plague-ridden fleas into a colony. Prairie dogs with plague in their bloodstream are very unlikely to introduce plague because the infected animals die quickly (Cully 1992).

Historically, the major predators on prairie dogs were primarily the black-footed ferret and the badger (Bailey 1905 in Koford 1958, Koford 1958, Stromberg et al. 1983, Cully 1989). Raptors, snakes, coyotes, foxes, and bobcats all prey upon prairie dogs, but usually at low rates (Koford 1958, Cully 1989, Powell unpubl. mans.). Starvation associated with drought and severe winters and interactions between old age and other mortality factors contribute to mortality (Koford 1958).

Colonies expand under force of crowding associated with high survival rates and lack of forage (Koford 1958, Garrett et al. 1982). Off-colony attributes facilitating expansion include high forage availability, forage quality, and deep soils. Inter-colony dispersal typically occurs from colonies that have reached carrying capacity, though emigration from young expanding colonies does occur (Garrett et al. 1982, Garrett and Franklin 1988). Dispersal occurs in the spring amongst healthy yearling males and adult females, which disperse an average 2.4 kilometers (Garrett and Franklin 1988). In Nebraska, Steuter (1992) found that prairie dogs attempting to establish new colonies were often killed by badgers. Little is known of the process of new colony initiation. In mixed prairie, prairie dogs may locate and attempt to colonize spots of disturbed land amidst dense grassland (Steuter 1992).

Average colony size is typically 20 to 60 hectares, though colonies of less than 10 hectares to complexes of several hundred hectares are not uncommon (Bishop and Culbertson 1976, Cheatheam 1977, Clark et al. 1982, Knowles 1986). One C. leucurus colony in Utah covered 958 hectares (Clark et al. 1982). Merriam (1902) reported a Texas black-tailed prairie dog colony covering 25,000 square miles. Average burrow density varies widely, from 9 per hectare to at least 250 per hectare (Bishop and Culbertson 1976, Clark et al. 1982, Reading et al. 1989). Thirty to 100 burrows per hectare is common. The number of burrow entrances per hectare also varies substantially, with 50 to 123 a typical range (King 1959). Density of prairie dogs fluctuates within and between years according to colony demographics, environmental conditions, forage availability, and soil and/or vegetation sites within towns (Koford 1958, Powell in progress). Typical adult densities are about 12 per hectare (Koford 1958, King 1959, Powell in progress). After young are weaned (and can be counted aboveground), densities of all age classes totaled typically range from 5 to 30 prairie dogs per hectare (Koford 1958, Hansen and Gold 1977, Knowles 1982 in Knowles 1986, O'Meilia et al. 1982). In three consecutive years, King (1959) noted densities in July on the same site to change from 22 to 14 to 41 prairie dogs per hectare.

In a study of 18 burrow systems Sheets et al. (1971) found the burrows ranging from 3 to 14 feet deep and 13 to 109 feet long, with tunnel diameter of 4 to 5 inches. Passageway plugs are used to inhibit predators, to compartmentalize and block off waste, or when the burrow system is under remodeling (Smith 1958 in Burns et al. 1989, Sheets et al. 1971, Martin et al. 1984, Burns et al. 1989).

Reproductive Characteristics
The breeding system is harem-polygynous, with most females copulating with one male and males with several females (Hoogland and Foltz 1982). Females achieve estrous as early as the second week in March in Montana (Knowles 1987). Females are in estrous for several hours of only one day per year (Hoogland and Foltz 1982). Gestation averages 35 days (Hoogland 1985, Knowles 1987). Though almost all adult females achieve estrous and many become pregnant, juvenile mortality is high with only one half of copulating females weaning a litter (Hoogland and Foltz 1982). Minimum breeding age is usually two years for both sexes (Hoogland 1985, Knowles 1987). Litter size typically averages about 4 (Knowles 1987) (3 in yearlings, 5 in older females) (Koford 1958).

Vegetation condition does not necessarily affect litter size, with adults producing an average litter size of 4.3 on "fair" rangeland and 5.7 on "severely depleted" rangeland (Koford 1958), but relatively large and small litters may follow high and low rainfall, respectively. Individual females produce one litter per year. Pups stay underground until weaned (Hoogland 1985). Pups appear above ground in about 5 to 8 weeks (mid-May to early June in Montana). Due to forage availability and stress associated with crowding, the number of weaned juveniles increases as the number of adults and yearlings decreases, and vice-versa (Hoogland et al. 1988).

Management
Prairie dogs in Montana are currently a species in need of management and as such, shooting of prairie dogs on public lands (excluding state school trust lands) is regulated. Consult Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks for the latest regulations. Prairie dogs are managed under the Conservation Plan for Black-tailed and White-tailed Prairie Dogs in Montana (Montana Prairie Dog Working Group 2002). Please consult this plan for details concerning prairie dog management in Montana.

Citations & Sources
  • Agnew, W., D. W. Uresk and R. M. Hansen. 1986. Flora and fauna associated with prairie dog colonies and adjacent ungrazed mixed-grass prairie in western South Dakota. Journal of Range Management 39:135-9.
  • Anderson, S. 1972. Mammals of Chihuahua. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 148(2).
  • Anthony, A. and D. Foreman. 1951. Observations on the reproductive cycle of the black-tailed prairie dog (CYNOMYS LUDOVICIANUS). Physiol. Zool. 24:242-8.
  • Bailey, V. 1905. Biological survey of Texas. Bur. Biol. Sur. North American Fauna 25. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 222 pp.
  • Bintz, G. L. 1984. Water balance, water stress, and the evolution of seasonal torpor in ground-dwelling sciurids. Pp. 142-65 in J. O. Murie and G. R. Michener (eds.). The Biology of Ground-dwelling Sciurids. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.
  • Bishop, N. G., and J. L. Culbertson. 1976. Decline of prairie dog towns in southwestern North Dakota. Journal Range Management 29:217-220.
  • Bonham, C. D. and A. Lerwick. 1976. Vegetation changes induced by prairie dogs on shortgrass range. Journal of Range Management 29:221-25.
  • Brown, Ted. 1992. Environmental Specialist, New Mexico Environmental Improvement Division.
  • Burns, J.A., D. L. Flath and T. W. Clark. 1989. On the structure and function of white-tailed prairie dog burrows. Great Basin Nat. 49:517-524.
  • Burt, W. H., and R. P. Grossenheider. 1976. A field guide to the mammals. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston. 289 pp.
  • Cain, S. A. et. al. 1971. Predator control - 1971. Report to the Council on Environmental Quality and the Department of the Interior by the Advisory Committee on Predator Control. Institute for Environmental Quality, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 207 pp.
  • Carpenter, J. R. 1940. The grassland biome. Ecological Monographs 10:617-683.
  • Ceballos-G., G. y D. Wilson. 1985. Cynomys mexicanus. Mamm. Species, 248: 1-3.
  • Cheatheam, L. K. 1977. Density and distribution of the black-tailed prairie dog in Texas. Texas J. Sci. 29:33-40.
  • Chesser, R. 1979. Genetic variablility of CYNOMYS LUDOVICIANUS in New Mexico. Final report to New Mexico Game and Fish Department, Santa Fe, NM.
  • Clark, T. W., T. M. Campbell III, D. G. Socha and D. E. Casey. 1982. Prairie dog colony attributes and associated vertebrate species. Great Basin Naturalist 1982:?
  • Clark, T.W., R.S. Hoffmann, and C.F. Nadler. 1971. CYNOMYS LEUCURUS. Mammalian Species, 7:1-4.
  • Clippinger, N. W. 1989. Habitat suitability index models: black-tailed prairie dog. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep. 82(10.156). 21 pp.
  • Coppock, D. L., J. E. Ellis, J. K. Detling and M. I. Dyer. 1983. Plant-herbivore interactions in a North American mixed-grass prairie. Part II, Responses of bison to modification of vegetation by prairie dogs. Oecologia 56:10-5.
  • Coppock, D. L., J. K. Detling, J. E. Ellis, and M. I. Dyer. 1983. Plant-herbivore interactions in a North American mixed-grass prairie. Part I, Effects of black-tailed prairie dogs on intraseasonal aboveground plant biomass and nutrient dynamics and plant species diversity. Oecologia 56:1-9.
  • Cully, J. F., Jr. 1989. Plague in prairie dog ecosystems: Importance for black-footed ferret management. Pp. 47-55. IN: T. W. Clark, D. Hinckley, and T. Rich, eds. The prairie dog ecosystem: Managing for biological diversity. Wildlife Technical Bulletin No. 2, Montana Bureau of Land Management, Billings. 55 pp.
  • Cully, J. F., Jr. 1992. Wildlife Biologist, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
  • Daley, J. G. 1992. Population reductions and genetic variability in black-tailed prairie dogs. Journal of Wildlife Management 56:212-20.
  • Dalsted, K. J., et al. 1981. Application of remote sensing to prairie dog management. Journal of Range Management 34:218-23.
  • Fagerstone, K. A. and D. E. Biggins. 1986. Comparison of capture-recapture and visual count indices of prairie dog densities in black-footed ferret habitat. Great Basin Naturalist Mem. 8:94-8.
  • Fagerstone, K. A., H. P. Tietjen and O. Williams. 1981. Seasonal variation in the diet of black-tailed prairie dogs. Journal of Mammalogy 62:820-4.
  • Federal Register, 25 March 1999. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-day Finding for a Petition To List the Black-Tailed Prairie Dog as Threatened. Volume 64, Number 57: 50 CFR Part 17. Proposed Rules: pp. 14424-14428.
  • Foresman, K.R. 2001. The wild mammals of Montana. Special Publication No. 12. American Society of Mammalogists
  • Garrett, M. G., and W. L. Franklin. 1988. Behavioral ecology of dispersal in the black-tailed prairie dog. J. Mamm. 69:236-250.
  • Garrett, M. G., J. L. Hoogland, and W. L. Franklin. 1982. Demographic differences between an old and a new colony of black-tailed prairie dogs (CYNOMYS LUDOVICIANUS LUDOVICIANUS). Amer. Midl. Nat. 108:51-9.
  • Goodwin, H. T. 1995. Pliocene-Pleistocene biogeographic history of prairie dogs, genus CYNOMYS (Sciuridae). Journal of Mammalogy 76:100-122.
  • Hall, E. Raymond. 1981. The Mammals of North America, Vols. I & II. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York. 1181 pp.
  • Hansen, R. M. and B. R. Cavender. 1973. Food intake and digestion by black-tailed prairie dogs under laboratory conditions. Acta Theriologica 18:191-200.
  • Hansen, R. M. and I. K. Gold. 1977. Blacktail prairie dogs, desert cottontails and cattle trophic relations on shortgrass range. J. Rng. Mgmt. 30(3):210-214.
  • Hillman, C. N., R. L. Linder, and R. B. Dahlgren. 1979. Prairie dog (CYNOMYS LUDOVICIANUS) distribution in areas inhabited by black-footed ferrets (MUSTELA NIGRIPES). Am. Midl. Nat. 102:185-7.
  • Hoffmeister, D. F. 1986. Mammals of Arizona. Univ. Arizona Press and Arizona Game and Fish Dept. 602 pp.
  • Hoogland, J. L. 1985. Infanticide in prairie dogs: lactating females kill offspring of close kin. Science 230:1037-40.
  • Hoogland, J. L. 1995. The black-tailed prairie dog. Univ. Chicage Press, Chicago, IL. 557 pp.
  • Hoogland, J. L. and D. W. Folts. 1982. Variance in male and female reproductive success in a harem-polygynous mammal, the black-tailed prairie dog (Sciuridae: CYNOMYS LUDOVICIANUS). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11:155-63.
  • Hoogland, J. L. et. al. 1988. Demography and population dynamics of prairie dogs. Pp. 18-22 in D. W. Uresk, G. L. Schenbeck and R. Cefkin. (technical coordinators). 8th Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings, Fort Collins, CO. USFS GTR RM-154. 231 pp.
  • King, J. 1955. Social behavior, social organization, and population dynamics in a black-tailed prairie dog town in the Black Hills of South Dakota. Mich. 123 pp.
  • Klatt, L. E. and D. Hein. 1978. Vegetative differences among active and abandoned towns of black-tailed prairie dogs (CYNOMYS LUDOVICIANUS). Journal of Range Mangement 31:315-7.
  • Knowles, C. J. 1982. Habitat affinity, populations, and control of black-tailed prairie dogs on the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Montana, Missoula. 171 pp.
  • Knowles, C. J. 1986. Some relationships of black-tailed prairie dogs to livestock grazing. Great Basin Naturalist 46(2):198-203.
  • Knowles, C. J. 1987. Reproductive ecology of black-tailed prairie dogs in Montana. Great Basin Naturalist 47(2): 202-206.
  • Knowles, C.J. 1985. Observations on prairie dog dispersal in Montana. Prairie Naturalist. 17:33-40
  • Koford, C. B. 1958. Prairie dogs, whitefaces, and blue grama. Wildlife Monograph 3:1-78.
  • Krueger, K. 1986. Feeding relationships among bison, pronghorn, and prairie dogs: an experimental analysis. Ecology 67:760-70.
  • Licht, D. S., and K. D. Sanchez. 1993. Association of black-tailed prairie dog colonies with cattle point attractants in the northern Great Plains. Great Basin Nat. 53:385-389.
  • Martin, S. J., M. H. Schroeder, and H. Tietjen. 1984. Burrow plugging by prairie dogs in response to Siberian polecats. Great Basin Naturalist 44:447-9.
  • Merriam, C. H. 1902. The prairie dog of the Great Plains. Pp. 257-70 in USDA Yearbook Agriculture for 1901, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
  • Miller, S. D., and J. F. Cully, Jr. 2001. Conservation of Black-tailed Prairie Dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). Journal of Mammalogy 82:889-893.
  • Oldemeyer, J. L., et al. 1993. Proceedings of the symposium on the management of prairie dog complexes for the reintroduction of the black-footed ferret. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 13. iii + 96 pp.
  • O'Meilia, M. E., F. L. Knopf, and J. C. Lewis. 1982. Some consequences of competition between prairie dogs and beef cattle. Journal of Range Management 35:580-5.
  • O'Meilia, M. E., F. L. Knopf, and J. C. Lewis. 1982. Some consequences of competition between prairie dogs and beef cattle. Journal of Range Management 35:580-5.
  • Osborn, B. 1942. Prairie dogs in shinnery (oak scrub) savannah. Ecology 23:110-5.
  • Pizzimenti, J. and G. D. Collier. 1975. CYNOMYS PARVIDENS. Mammalian Species No. 52:1-3.
  • Pizzimenti, J.J. and R.S. Hoffmann. 1973. CYNOMYS GUNNISONI.Mammalian Species, 25:1-4.
  • Powell, K. L. No date. Prairie dog distribution, habitat characteristics, and population monitoring in Kansas: implications for black-footed ferret recovery. Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS. Draft M.S. Thesis. Unpublished.
  • Reading, R. P. et. al. 1989. Attributes of black-tailed prairie dog colonies in northcentral Montana, with management recommendations for conservation of biodiversity. Pp. 13-27 in T. W. Clark, D. Hinckley, and T. Rich (eds.). The prairie dog ecosystem: Managing for biological diversity. Wildl. Tech. Bull. No. 2., Montana Bureau of Land Management, Billings, MO. BLM-MT-PT-89-004-4352.
  • Sheets, R. G., R. L. Linder and R. B. Dahlgren. 1971. Burrow systems of prairie dogs in South Dakota. Journal of Mammalogy 52:451-3.
  • Smith, R. E. 1958. Natural history of the prairie dog in Kansas. Kansas University Museum of Natural History State Biol. Surv. Misc. Publ. No. 16. 36 pp.
  • Stromberg, M. R., R. L. Rayburn, and T. W. Clark. 1983. Black-footed ferret prey requirements: an energy balance estimate. J. Wildlife Management 47:67-73.
  • Summers, C. A. and R. L. Linder. 1978. Food habits of the black-tailed prairie dog in western South Dakota. Journal of Range Management 31(2):134-136.
  • Thorp, J. 1949. Effects of certain animals that live in soils. Scientific Monthly 68:180-91.
  • Turman, Hop. 1992. Biologist (not official title), USDA-ADC.
  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000. 12-month finding for a petition to list the black-tailed prairie dog as threatened. Federal Register 65(24):5476-5488.
  • Uresk, D. W. 1984. Black-tailed prairie dog food habits and forage relationships in western South Dakota. Journal of Range Management 37:325-9.
  • Van Pelt, Bill. 1992. Biologist (not official title), Arizona Game and Fish.
  • Vosburgh, T. C., and L. R. Irby. 1998. Effects of recreational shooting on prairie dog colonies. The Journal of Wildlife Management 62:363-372.
  • Wedin, D. 1992. Ecologist, Department Ecol. Behav. Biol., Univerity of Minnesota.
 
There are currently 88 active users in the Montana Field Guide.